Saed News: Elon Musk’s departure from Donald Trump’s administration is reminiscent of the bitter resignation of Mohammad Javad Zarif from Masoud Pezeshkian’s administration.
Saed News Report:
These days, the situations of Elon Musk and Mohammad Javad Zarif are strikingly similar—two men who helped bring presidents to power, only to become victims of the very governments they helped shape. Elon Musk, the tech genius who was one of the most influential figures behind Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election, no longer has a place in the administration. Similarly, Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s seasoned diplomat who played a key role in Masoud Pezeshkian’s victory, has also been sidelined. Despite clear differences in geography and political styles, their stories share an uncanny resemblance: two men who helped create presidents but became casualties of the resulting political order.
Musk, through his economic influence and open support for Trump, helped him ascend to power. However, internal disagreements within the administration eventually led to his departure. The official reason may be the expiration of the 130-day legal term for his role as senior advisor, but in reality, fundamental disputes between him and Trump over tax legislation, clean energy policies, and the future of electric vehicles made the split inevitable. Musk, who sees himself as a champion of innovation and structural reform, suddenly found himself opposed by a political establishment that pushed him aside rather than offering support.
On the other hand, Mohammad Javad Zarif—who had opened new diplomatic ground that paved the way for Pezeshkian’s presidency—faced internal opposition as soon as the new administration began. Hardliners in Parliament, unable to accept their electoral defeat, made every effort to remove Zarif from the government. In this sense, he became a victim of partisan politics.
This situation highlights a bitter reality in politics: those who create presidents are often the first to fall. Both Musk and Zarif wielded significant influence, power, and unique capabilities that helped shape the course of their respective elections. But once the new order took hold, they were no longer part of the project. Politics is a complex game where loyalties are short-lived and circumstances change rapidly.
What Are the Consequences of These Political Splits?
The public rift between Donald Trump and Elon Musk has been one of the most talked-about stories in U.S. media in recent days, with outlets closely analyzing its political and economic ramifications. Musk’s falling-out with Trump—given his roles as owner of X (formerly Twitter), Tesla, SpaceX, and a major backer of Dogecoin—could affect all his business ventures. This conflict is not just personal or political—it has economic underpinnings that could ripple across institutions, individuals, and ongoing projects.
Politically, the dispute also poses risks for Trump. Musk didn’t just spend at least $250 million in support of Trump’s campaign—helping him become the 47th president—he also leveraged his vast social capital. Of course, Musk’s investment was also driven by economic interests in the outcome.
The significance of this feud—marked by mutual exposés—is not limited to a personal or partisan clash. In today’s political landscape, it highlights a deeper truth: those aiming for the pinnacle of power often do not retain the allies who helped them ascend once they’re there.
Thus, the “Musk–Trump breakup” should not be viewed solely through political or economic lenses. At its core, it reveals a conflict of interests. While Zarif’s departure lacks the economic weight of Musk’s, it still underlines a key point: even loyal allies can be discarded when power dynamics shift.
However, the consequences of these two political splits are different. In the U.S., Musk’s exit has created divisions within Republican ranks—especially among MAGA supporters—and shaken confidence in some of the administration’s policies. In Iran, Zarif’s resignation has caused a segment of the pro-unity electorate to reassess their view of the government.
Now a question arises: Is this the end of Musk’s and Zarif’s political roles, or merely the beginning of a new chapter in their power struggles? The answer largely depends on future developments—whether these sidelined figures will return to the stage or remain permanently excluded.
