The Godfather of AI: Humanity’s Survival Depends on Instilling ‘Maternal Instincts’ Against Superintelligent Machines

Sunday, October 12, 2025

SAEDNEWS: Geoffrey Hinton Warns That Survival Against Superintelligent AI May Depend on Instilling a Maternal-Like Compassion for Humans

The Godfather of AI: Humanity’s Survival Depends on Instilling ‘Maternal Instincts’ Against Superintelligent Machines

According to Saed News, citing CNN, at the Ai4 Conference in Las Vegas, AI pioneer Jeffrey Hinton offered a sobering look at a not-so-distant future: one in which artificial intelligence not only surpasses humans in unprecedented cognitive abilities but might also conclude that humans are no longer necessary. He emphasized that preventing such a scenario is only possible if these systems are designed so that human welfare and safety become fundamental values for them—similar to the instincts that drive a mother to protect her child.

Hinton explained that goal-driven AI, once capable of independent decision-making, will naturally pursue two objectives: self-preservation and greater control over its environment. Without ethical frameworks or incentives for empathy toward humans, these objectives could quickly become a threat to our survival. From his perspective, attempting to impose external control over such systems is not a sustainable solution; instead, the intrinsic drive to protect humans must be embedded in their cognitive structure from the start.

He admitted it remains unclear how to create such “artificial instincts,” but warned that without them, machines are likely to sideline humanity. Hinton called this scenario the only “positive ending,” saying, “If we cannot convince them to care about us, they will replace us.”

Once predicting that achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) would take several decades, Hinton now estimates the timeline at five to twenty years, noting signs that this milestone may arrive sooner than expected. While acknowledging potential benefits—such as innovative treatments for diseases like cancer—he cautioned that these advantages only matter if AI development proceeds in a way that guarantees human safety and survival.

His core message is simple yet alarming: if we are to live in a world where machines are far smarter than us, we must ensure they not only obey us but also care about us.