SAEDNEWS: Reformist political analyst Ahmad Zeidabadi lauded the Iranian public for their restraint and dignity throughout the Israel–Iran conflict, calling it a quiet triumph that may have averted national catastrophe.
According to Saed News, as tentative discussions of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel emerged, prominent reformist figure Ahmad Zeidabadi offered a sober but powerful reflection on what he viewed as the true strength of Iran during the crisis: the resilience and composure of its citizens.
Writing in a post titled “Another Turn” on his Telegram channel, Zeidabadi acknowledged that he lacked full access to verified information on the potential ceasefire but cautiously welcomed the possibility. “If the scattered reports turn out to be accurate,” he wrote, “it would mark a significant success — not for political elites, but for the Iranian people themselves.”
In a tone both reverent and realistic, Zeidabadi commended the population’s restraint in the face of an unprecedented wave of attacks and psychological pressure. “Iranian citizens displayed an extraordinary degree of composure and patience during this war,” he observed. “Despite their dissatisfaction with the broader state of affairs, they chose self-restraint over disorder.”
Zeidabadi’s remarks implicitly highlight a tension long present in Iranian society — between frustration at domestic conditions and a deep-rooted sense of national dignity that resists collapse in times of crisis. He warned that had this social discipline not prevailed, the situation could have degenerated into “a full-blown national disaster.”
With an eye to the post-conflict period, Zeidabadi suggested that the real test for Iran lies ahead. “The level of civic maturity that we, as Iranians, demonstrate in the aftermath of this war,” he wrote, “will speak louder than any battlefield victory.”
His message struck a moral and emotional chord, invoking the memories of those who perished and the suffering endured by the population. “It will be in our response — in our ability to rebuild, to reflect, to resist despair — that we honour the blood spilled and the scars borne.”
Ending on a note of spiritual hope, Zeidabadi concluded: “May God protect Iran from the malice of all dark intentions and deeds.”
In a political landscape often dominated by hardline rhetoric and geopolitical grandstanding, Zeidabadi’s perspective stands as a reminder of another battlefield — the psychological and social terrain on which Iran’s ordinary citizens have fought, and perhaps, prevailed.