Iran’s Nuclear Strategy Will Definitely Change: The Final Nail Will Be Hammered Into Netanyahu’s Coffin...

Saed News reports, quoting ISNA: Following Israel’s attack on Iran, Seyed Hossein Mousavian, former nuclear negotiator and diplomat, wrote on his X account titled "10 Points on Israel’s War Against Iran":

1. Israel’s military aggression against Iran began exactly one day after Trump’s two-month deadline to Iran regarding nuclear negotiations expired!

2. This aggression is a clear violation of the United Nations Charter and all international norms and regulations, which cannot be remedied merely by condemnation statements from UN member states.

3. Israel coordinated its attack plan on Iran with NATO leaders in advance and, with the green light from the U.S. and NATO, initiated the war against Iran. Therefore, NATO is responsible for defending Israel against Iran’s military counteractions. In this war, NATO is effectively involved directly or indirectly with Iran. Iran showed last night with the attack on the Kirya building that the entire occupied territories are within reach.

4. Since the start of nuclear negotiations with Iran in 2003, Israel aimed to sabotage these talks, destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities, and draw the U.S. and NATO into a war with Iran.

5. At a 2011 seminar, a former head of Mossad intelligence told the then Iranian ambassador to the IAEA that "Your main negotiating opponent in the nuclear talks is Israel, not the P5+1 countries." Israel’s success in undermining the talks discredited the P5+1 group.

6. Israel’s military attack is the largest operation against Iran since World War II and Saddam Hussein’s invasion. Saddam was supported by NATO, Eastern powers, and Arab countries but was ultimately defeated. The current Eastern bloc powers and Arab countries are not allied with Israel and NATO against Iran.

7. Israel’s attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities is an attack by a nuclear-armed country on a non-nuclear state. This exposes the ineffectiveness of the NPT treaty and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Particularly, Israel’s attack revealed the illegal nature of a recent resolution against Iran.

8. The attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities will undoubtedly impact Iran’s future nuclear strategy. NATO, Israel, and the IAEA paved the way for this strategic shift.

9. Israel’s main goal in the new hybrid war against Iran is regime change, creating instability, chaos, and even the disintegration of Iran. The outcome of this war will significantly influence the future balance of power in the Middle East.

10. The U.S. and NATO, by giving Israel the green light, have made a major strategic error. The fate of this war will greatly affect the role and calculations of Eastern and Western powers in the Middle East.