Consequences of U.S. Military Entry into the War

According to saednews, Fadakhessin Maleki, in an interview, referring to part of the Supreme Leader’s message about the crimes of the Zionist regime and the warning to the United States, said: Important meanings and messages can be derived from the essence of the Supreme Leader’s message.

He explained: The United States has not only been a source of crisis in the region but also played a role in provoking the Zionist regime in the recent war—precisely at a time when the Islamic Republic of Iran was engaged in indirect negotiations with the U.S. The American crime of provoking the Zionist regime to attack Iran is no less than the crimes of this regime in assassinating our military commanders, scientists, and innocent people; we knew that the U.S. was behind the scenes.

This member of the Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee added: The second point in the Supreme Leader’s message is that if the U.S. decides to directly enter the battlefield in support of the Zionist regime, several important events will happen. First, Iran will enter the battlefield with greater power and new technology beyond what it has used so far in military equipment and defense technologies against the Zionist regime; this will happen while the Iranian nation stands united and supports the armed forces.

Maleki continued: The third point is that this ongoing situation will push the world toward bipolarity. On one side, the U.S. along with some European countries support the Zionists, and on the other side, some countries like Pakistan stand firmly alongside the Islamic Republic of Iran. The leaders of Russia and China have also held phone talks emphasizing that the Americans should not enter the war. Make no mistake—if the U.S. enters the war, powers such as China and Russia will enter in support of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

He noted: Moreover, we see signs of an awakening in the Islamic world against the infidelity of the Zionist regime; today, among Muslim nations, hatred toward the Zionist regime is rising. Furthermore, Islamic nations, especially religious and spiritual leaders in Islamic countries, support Iran’s attacks on the Zionist regime.

Maleki spoke about the position of resistance diplomacy in regional developments: Today, we witness an all-out war between Iran and the Zionist regime, while regional and international diplomatic efforts are also active. This atmosphere aligns with our previous negotiations with the U.S. and efforts to stop the war, so our approach must be calculated and cautious to avoid repeating history.

He explained: In wartime conditions, negotiation has no meaning. The idea of peace with the Zionist regime, which started the war, has no meaning either. The Zionists began the war, and it is Iran that must end it—not by negotiating with countries like France and Germany. Therefore, the diplomatic apparatus must be careful not to corner us, especially when the winning card in the battlefield is with Iran.