Hardliners’ Plans Like Closing Strait of Hormuz Risk National Security, Says Expert

Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, political analyst and former Iranian parliament member, spoke to Etemad newspaper regarding the potential risks of hasty political decisions in Iran.

Falahatpisheh criticized hardliner proposals in the 11th and 12th parliaments, including exiting the NPT or closing the Strait of Hormuz, arguing that such measures have historically resulted in national losses. He emphasized that the role of diplomacy is to create initiatives that protect national interests rather than provide pretexts for adversaries.

He pointed out that past aggressive parliamentary actions have led to diplomatic deadlocks, including the suspension of relations with the IAEA. Falahatpisheh noted that these deadlocks have real costs, impacting ordinary Iranians, while adversaries like former U.S. officials use internal disputes to justify sanctions or potential attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Falahatpisheh highlighted that 84% of oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz is destined for China and other Asian countries, noting that Iran’s role in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization strengthens economic security. He called for ending stalemates with the IAEA, establishing mechanisms that respect Iran’s NPT rights while allowing inspections that do not compromise national security.

He concluded that negotiations with European countries have proven ineffective and that Iran should focus on resolving strategic issues with the United States.